Performance of CSS Transitions vs. JS animation packages

I’m wondering is there any difference in performance of using CSS Transitions vs. any of the various JavaScript animation libraries? (script.aculo.us, scripty2, jsAnim, MooTools, $fx, etc).

I’ve tried various tests in Safari and Chrome but I don’t actually see any difference. I thought that CSS Transitions were supposed to be hardware accelerated.


Update:

I’ve tried using Scriptaculous’ Effect.Fade on 5 different DIVs (each containing a canvas with some lines). Doing the exact same thing using CSS transitions, I see absolutely no difference in performance. Both were very smooth with one DIV/Canvas, but both are very slow when I do more than 2 at a time.

I’ve tried this in Safari 4, 5 (OSX), Google Chrome 5 and FireFox 3.7pre. Same results across the board.

In answer to UpHelix’s response, you’re not simply limited to hover, etc. You can trigger a transition by changing any transitionable style. For instance, set the opacity of an element in JavaScript (after, you’ve specified the transitionPropery and transitionDuration for that element).

Answer

Yes, there is a difference, CSS is much faster. It may be difficult to see until you get many running at the same time or the more they do. CSS animations are limited though. In most cases they really only work off the :hover event. With JavaScript you can perform animations at any event: click, mouseover, mousemove, mouseout, keyup, keydown, etc.

In my opinion, jQuery is the best for JavaScript animations in 2010. See jQuery Demos

Attribution
Source : Link , Question Author : desau , Answer Author : UpHelix

Leave a Comment